Saving Greece’s Sinking Ship

March 5th, 2010

Followers of the financial markets remember what happened to Lehman Brothers during the two weeks leading up to its collapse and sub sequential shock to the global economy. The question is: has the world learned lessons on how to handle this type of crisis?

It seems that in our current market place we are divided into two teams – winners and losers. But instead of competition being held on a balanced playing field, where skill and position decide the outcome of the game, we have a game that is more like American Gladiators, where one team is made up of contestants and the other team is made up of gladiators. Gladiators do not compete against competitors, but instead act as blockers or impediments designed to stop competitors from achieving any type of goal. The American Gladiator arena is basically how the market for Credit Default Swaps (CDS) has been operating. The buyers of CDS, specifically buyers who don’t own the underlying security, are trying to be blockers of Greece achieving its goal of stabilization, as they stand to make a significant winning if Greece is unable to recover and subsequently defaults.

A default by one Euro country could be disastrous for all European countries and this is because of contagion. Contagion is ultimately what led to the currency crisis during the 1990s in emerging economies. The effect on the market occurs because investors begin to treat securities that are similar as identical comparisons, which leads to major sell-offs in indices and underlying securities that are related to the original security. If Greece defaults, investors will look to withdraw from the rest of Europe’s PIIGS (Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece and Spain) because they will view these countries as equally susceptible to the risk of default. As a result, the European Union economic zone would risk collapse as after time investors will start to pull away from stronger countries within the European Union. The best recent example of this is what happened to Goldman Sachs during 2008. Goldman Sachs was never at risk of collapsing and they are (and were arguably) the most stable bank within the financial institutions industry and yet their risk of default increased and their stock began to fall simply because weaker financial institutions were beginning to default. Europe has an obligation to itself to rescue Greece and put it on the right track to stability, as it risks its own demise if Greece fails. The European Union, International Monetary Fund and European Central Bank are expected to save Greece if their government makes difficult, but appropriate budgetary choices. If they succeed in staving off a collapse then Europe will be stronger for having done so, as the world would’ve just watched a coordinated effort across the continent to address real concerns, something that many would argue Europe has not done since the birth of the European Union.

The Euro currency has so far been the only real victim in this Greek drama, as it has fallen 3% over the past month. Gyrations in currencies often bring positive effects and negative ones. A falling Euro is good for the European export market as it makes their goods more competitive around the globe, however it is generally bad for the European import and consumer market as cheap discretionary goods become more expensive. The area where this could cause the largest dent to the European consumer is that of energy costs. A significant portion of the natural gas that Europe consumes comes from Russia and the already high fuel prices in Europe could increase further as a result of a weaker currency.

The US has experienced a weakening currency over the last 8 years, which has led to higher energy prices in the domestic market, but it has also benefitted our recovery, as US exports are very competitive in the global market. The relative strengthening that the US dollar has been experiencing is because of a greater global uncertainty (on a relative basis) in other developed countries. If the Greek crisis has shown anything at all from a US perspective, it’s that the US treasury market is still very robust and is considered to be the safe currency. But in saying that, we must remain cautious because if Europe cannot contain the Greek crisis, which ends up causing the Europe crisis, we must be wary that the sentiment does not spread to the US. If there are signs of a collapse, leap into the stable investments such as gold and US treasuries to protect yourself from what could be called the double dip.

Making sure your investment doesn’t blow away or burn up

February 5th, 2010

Renewable energy is growing at aggressive rates and the United States is expected to double its output of renewable energy from 2008 to 2013 and based on installed megawatts of wind and in 2008 and 2009, the US could even surpass those targets.

• Wind installations in the US were 8,558 MW and 9,914 MW in 2008 and 2009, respectively – American Wind Energy Association (AWEA).
• Solar installations in the US were 1,265 MW in 2008 and 2009 is expected to show a significant solar increase - Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA).

In addition to the markets that are commonly associated with renewable energy, there are also other relevant renewable energy industries that demonstrate investment potential, including geothermal, which currently has 7,000 MW under development in 14 states (Geothermal Energy Association).
As investors, we know that no company is identical to another and no company can expect to have identical returns to their competitors. There should be no difference in analysis between a small cap and a large cap company. This criterion is especially true in the energy producing marketplace no matter which type of feedstock/energy source is being used to generate power.
The unfamiliar renewable energy investor has little knowledge of what to look for in a wind, solar or geothermal power producer and it’s critically important in a growth sector for investors to understand key metrics before they make their investment.
Firstly, here are a few power producer facts an investor should know:

• 1 MW powers almost 800 homes in the US
• Installed/nameplate capacity is how much energy is produced if no energy is lost
• Net capacity factor is how much energy is actually produced
• Baseload power is 24 hour power – geothermal is baseload, whereas solar and wind are not
• It’s always better to invest in a project or company that has completed Power Purchasing Agreements with the electricity distributor. These agreements are long term agreements that guarantee the purchase price of the power produced by the generation project
• Every project will have to go through an extensive and important permitting process with the required authorities
• Commercial Operation Date (COD) is the date the project comes online and produces power

The key drivers of how much energy produced by wind, solar and geothermal are based on their respective resources, which differ based on geography.  When analyzing wind projects or companies it is important to know where their wind farms are located and the strength of their wind resource (http://www.windpoweringamerica.gov/wind_maps.asp).  Solar potential is analyzed by solar irradiance data and certain solar technologies work better under different solar irradiance and weather conditions. Therefore it is also important to know that the technology a solar power producer is using is the correct application for the specific region (http://www.nrel.gov/gis/solar.html).  Geothermal requires even more research as it’s important to know the location(http://smu.edu/geothermal/2004NAMap/2004NAmap.htm), the technology being employed (dual flash or binary steam), drilling costs and the temperature of its source. Knowing these items, will help an investor become more knowledgeable about the sector and will have a better understanding of where to put their money and where not to.

Today, there are more public renewable energy companies than there were two years ago and that number will only increase as renewable energy producers look to expand their reach. Geothermal companies are traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange and a few wind and solar power producers are traded on the Nasdaq and OTC.

Renewable portfolio standards, which have been enacted in several states, are significant steps in making this sector the growth sector of tomorrow. In addition, if news comes out of Washington that there will be a cap and trade policy, it will only further this industry’s growth as it will create another product that the power producer will  be able to sell.  If cap and trade doesn’t happen, these companies will still be good investments as big steps in making the US a cleaner energy producing and more energy independent nation will be enacted in the energy bill.

Drilling for an Investment

January 19th, 2010

The global economy produces an estimated 86.3 billion barrels of oil per day and 114.5 trillion cubic feet per day of natural gas in 2010 and is forecasted to grow to 95.9 billion barrels of oil per day and 136.8 trillion cubic feet per day of natural gas by 2020, according to the Energy Information Administration (“EIA”). The forecasted “reference case” for oil & gas production growth represents a 10% and 20% increase, respectively. This data suggests that not only will production increase at existing oil & gas sites, but many new wells will be drilled to meet the increasing global demand for energy.

The world’s oil & gas industry is fundamentally driven by three macroeconomic factors i) Economic Growth, ii) Energy Resources and iii) World Price of Oil/Gas.  All of these factors are more or less dependent on each other. Global economic growth, which most economist predict to happen around the world over the next five years, will fuel an increase in demand for energy producing products thus driving up the price of Oil & Gas. An increase in prices leads to an increase in exploration and production as companies and governments around the world look to capitalize on high energy prices by drilling for new reserves and extracting more from existing wells. However, increasing production isn’t necessarily an easy task as OPEC sets production targets/quotas for its member states as it seeks to maintain a favorable price on oil.  Countries not in OPEC (and companies not in OPEC countries) stand to gain as they can increase production to capitalize on higher energy prices desired by OPEC. 

When considering investment opportunities in the oil & gas industry it’s important to consider where along the industry’s production stream meets your investment risk/return requirements. The industry’s production stream is made up of three main components, which are often referred to as upstream, midstream and downstream operations.
• Upstream: Oil exploration and production
• Midstream: Pipelines and storage
• Downstream: Refineries and distribution/marketing; Products derived from petroleum

Some companies such as Exxon, Shell, BP, Hess and CITGO offer and own services throughout the entire production stream from drilling for oil & gas to delivering the refined product to the consumer. These companies offer a good balance between different risk factors that are associated with their pure play competitors, as they distribute the risk/return across all of their operations.

Investing in specific components of the production stream can bring significant returns but can also bring significant risks. The upstream segment represents the highest risk/return reward, as it offers the biggest return if new wells and reserves are discovered, but that is only if they have a good success rate in discovery and extraction. The midstream segment offers a stable investment with a low risk/return reward, but offers stable and dependable returns, as pipelines and distribution networks are always required to transport oil & gas. As energy demand grows, requiring larger transportation networks, the midstream segment will also experience growth. At this time, it is unadvisable to consider investing in the downstream market, as pure play refineries often suffer from a margin squeeze that’s caused by differing futures in oil & gas markets and increases in capital expenditure required to upgrade equipment in order to deal with more complex forms of oil.

Recently, there have been some bright spots in exploration and production, in addition to the discovery of BP’s giant oil discovery in the Gulf of Mexico, output is expected to improve as the rig count has been growing and smarter extraction technologies, such as carbon dioxide injection, have been more broadly implemented. The industry has also seen costs decline, which translate directly into higher margins for upstream companies.  Companies engaged in exploration and production that have locked in long term contracts for rigs and other costs at recent low levels will be sound investments going forward.

Sustainable Packaging for the Greater Good

January 8th, 2010

Sustainable Packaging for the Greater Good
January 8, 2010 - Over the next decade the global economy is expected to see significant growth in “green” goods and technology.  The “green” economy can be broadly defined as a product, service or energy that causes little to no harm to the environment. The fundamental economic driver that will expand this economy is the increasing demand for environmental sustainability by consumers, commercial interests and governments.  The components that make up the “green” economy include renewable energy, recycling and composting.  Recently, the majority of media attention has been focused on renewable energy as the world suffers from a global energy shortage and energy prices continue to rise. However, the sustainable packaging industry, a largely unnoticed and high growth industry within the recycling and composting component, deserves the attention of analysts and investors.
Currently, non-degradable packaging dominates the $429 billion worldwide packaging market, but the market share of these non-degradable products is reducing and reducing quickly. According to Pike Research, the total global packaging market is expected to grow 24% ($429 billion to $530 billion) during the period from 2009 to 2014. The growth seen in this industry is largely driven by the increase in demand for packaged consumer goods in developing countries. But as available landfills become scarcer and consumers & producers shift towards “green” products, the sustainable packaging industry stands to make large gains by meeting consumer, producer and environmental demands. The sustainable packaging market currently represents 20% of the total market for global packaging and is predicted to gain a 32% market share by 2014, which represents an increase of 93% over that time period.

In order to be considered to be a product of sustainable packaging, the product has to meet the specific criteria that are listed below:
• Is beneficial, safe & healthy for individuals and communities throughout its life cycle;
• Meets market criteria for performance and cost;
• Is sourced, manufactured, transported, and recycled using renewable energy;
• Optimizes the use of renewable or recycled source materials;
• Is manufactured using clean production technologies and best practices;
• Is made from materials healthy in all probable end of life scenarios;
• Is physically designed to optimize materials and energy;
• Is effectively recovered and utilized in biological and/or industrial closed loop cycles.

One of the largest winners within the sustainable packaging industry will be plant based materials (also referred to as eco-friendly plastics). These packaging products are legitimate alternatives in strength and design to non-degradable plastics that currently make up 33% of the total packaging industry. Plant based materials can be home compostable, which makes the packaging products extremely environmentally friendly. In Q2 2009, Sun Chips announced that the company will begin selling their snacks in home compostable packaging made from plant based materials in 2010. In addition, food and meat distributors have recently signed contracts with companies around the globe that supply plant based materials. The companies that supply these packaging products are expected to see very high growth in their production in the near future.

Investment Grade Alternative Energy

December 7th, 2009

The demand for electric power is expected to increase from 14.8 trillion kilowatt-hours in 2003 to 30.1 trillion kilowatt-hours in 2030 according to the Energy Information Administration.  This demand is fueled by the increase in global energy consumption by developing countries producing more energy for their populations as well as the increase in the demand for energy in developed economies as an increase in ownership of gadgets, household items and automobiles consume more energy.  Today, the world generates a large majority of energy from coal, natural gas and oil. In emerging markets such as China, energy growth is being fueled by coal-fired power plant construction at a rate of one per month, thus furthering the demand for fossil fuels and increasing emissions of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.  The rising prices of fossil fuels due to an increase in supply and demand constraints and the weaker dollar, as well as the increased awareness in climate change have led to an increase in investment in alternative energy.

Over the next 50 years fossil fuels are still expected to be a main source of energy, however their percentage share as energy providers will decline considerably to give way to alternative energy providers.  These alternative energy providers include solar, wind, biomass, geothermal and many others. In addition to these providers, an energy application market will further increase efficiency with the use of smart grid technologies.

The single-most important item in regards to longevity for an alternative energy provider is that they are able to achieve a level of profitability in the medium term, when government subsidies expire. In order for this to occur the company has to achieve grid parity. Grid parity is achieved when the price per kilowatt-hour of alternative energy is equal to the price per kilowatt-hour produced by fossil fuels. These prices vary by region and alternative energy companies will have to focus on regions where it is economically viable for them to compete with traditional energy providers.

The drive for energy production has always been spurred on by government investment and incentives. The ARRA (American Reinvestment and Recovery Act) will provide the necessary capital to alternative energy businesses in order for those companies to drive their costs down, expand to scale and become more profitable. In total, energy received $70 billion from the stimulus package including $11 billion in improvements in the electrical grid, $2 billion in advanced battery technology and as well as $1.6 billion in clean energy bonds on top of the $800 million already allocated by the IRS in 2006.

As the supply of fossil fuels is reduced and overall demand for energy increases we will experience an increase in prices. Over the short and long-term fossil fuels present themselves as stable investment opportunities based on the supply and demand equation. The alternative energy market will be a high growth market, which will consist of a lot of winners and losers.  The alternative energy market will also be high-risk market, but in order to hedge risk in the sector, it’s important to invest in proven technologies and developments that are bankable. In the end, investing in energy providers and manufacturers during a global energy crisis will provide returns, however it will depend on an investor’s risk appetite in determining the yield of those returns.

**STOCK ALERT OF THE WEEK**

December 3rd, 2009

 

**STOCK ALERT OF THE WEEK**
Take a look at our new stock alert…this one looks good for a pop in the short term!

FORC.OB (Force Energy Corp)

A very recent press release from the company announced there are new discoveries on the north end of the property. They’ve also retained a drilling company to target the drill site and start drilling.

Check out their website, do your due diligence and good luck to all!

http://www.forceenergycorp.com/

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=FORC.OB

DOW firmly over 10k today

November 9th, 2009

Looks like the DOW now has a solid footing north of 10k. The question is will it stay there.

Recent weeks have seen the DOW moving in a wide range as different economic reports hit the street along with some company quarterly reports.

My guess is that the employment rate will rise before it goes down. The economic wheel does seem to be moving again, albeit slowly. As industrial and consumer goods orders rise, so will the need to bring back workers. This will be a long slow painful process, but should begin to right itself by end of first quarter 2010 with positive employment number beginning to appear.

Don’t expect retail sales for the upcoming holidays to do anything but either be flat or dip. Consumers as a rule are still holding onto cash, paying off debt and building savings. The last year has been a wake up call for everyone. It’s always hard to sober up after the free flow of money fueled by easy credit.

We are by no means out of the woods yet, but there does seem to be a glimmer of hope on the horizon. If only we can hang on to that hope, until we get there.

Looking forward to a prosperous upcoming year.

US Domestic Oil Production: The Permian Basin

October 28th, 2009

With continued unrest in the Middle East and around the world, the US is working to develop a domestic oil program that can lower our dependence on oil imports. Today we will examine the very productive area of West Texas and Eastern New Mexico called the Permian Basin.

Situated in the southwest area of Texas that borders New Mexico, lies a large oval shaped bowl that has been producing oil and gas for America’s energy needs since the 1920s. The Permian Basin is a sedimentary basin that reaches from just south of Lubbock, Texas, to just south of Midland & Odessa, extending westward into the southeastern part of the adjacent state of New Mexico.

permian-basin-map

The name derives from the fact that the area was down-warped before being covered by the Permian sea and it contains one of the thickest deposits of Permian rocks found anywhere. Although it is structurally a basin in the subsurface, much of the basin lies under the Llano Estacado and the northwestern portion of the Edwards Plateau, which are topographically high. On the west and south it extends across the Pecos River valley to mountain ranges in both New Mexico and West Texas.

The entire Permian Basin extends beneath an area approximately 250 miles wide and 300 miles long. The greater Permian Basin comprises several component basins: of these, Midland Basin is the largest, Delaware Basin is the second largest, and Marfa Basin is the smallest.

The Department of Energy came out with a very thorough report of known and potential reserves in the area.

The Permian Basin has produced oil for more than 80 years, and it is still one of the largest petroleum-producing basins in the U.S. In 2002, it accounted for 17% of the total U.S. oil production, and it contains an estimated 22% of the U.S. proved oil reserves. Moreover, this region has the biggest potential for additional oil production in the country, containing 29% of estimated future oil reserve growth. Because of the substantial amount of oil remaining in the basin, a new oil-play portfolio was developed.

permian-reserves

Total production for the region up to the beginning of 1993 was over 14.9 billion barrels.

http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/oil-gas/Petroleum/projects/EP/ResChar/15131UofTX.htm

While major production has tapered off over the last few years, US Government agencies still look to the Permian Basin as a major resource for domestic production. A Bureau of Land Management report states that the area remains a significant oil-producing province and contains an estimated 30 Bbbl of remaining mobile oil. Increased use of enhanced-recovery practices in the Permian Basin can have a substantial impact on U.S. oil production. Several Bureau projects are focused on reservoir characterization and play analysis of the Permian Basin.

top-5-us-areas-for-oil

New technologies coming into play, along with better survey techniques and higher oil prices are bringing many “non-producing” wells back into play.

Analysts are Bull on Oil

October 26th, 2009

With winter coming, get ready for oil to continue it’s upward climb. Weather predictions for the Northeast United States is calling for an abnormally cold winter due to a smaller El Nino effect in the Pacific Ocean.

Couple that with a weak dollar and continued economic stability and you have oil heading to the century mark.

Friday last week (Oct. 23) saw oil break through the $80 ceiling, holding steady this morning at $80.35. According to the Energy Information Administration’s Petroleum Navigator, the week delivered the highest prices since last fall.

Richard Ross, a Technical analyst for Auerbach Grayson, is seeing the same thing: crude oil will trend upward to $85, then $90, settling in at as much as $103 per barrel within the next nine months. $103 represents a 61.8% retracement of the decline in oil, and serves as a strong indicator for traders and analysts.

Mexico’s Troubled Oil Industry

October 20th, 2009

Mexico is now facing one of the swiftest declines in oil revenues in their history. With little or no money being pumped back into the sector for research and exploration, Mexico is now looking at a decline that will be harder and harder to recover from.

In December 2006, production went below 3.0 mbpd for the first time since 2001. Now its output is just 600,000 b/d. There are no obvious replacements: 23 of the 32 biggest fields are in decline. Barring big new finds, the world’s seventh-largest oil producer is forecast to become a net importer by 2017.

Why is this happening you ask?

The problem is that the Mexican constitution does not allow private investment in hydrocarbons. The state run oil company, Pemex, has not been run as a business. Profits have not been turned back into the company for further research and exploration. The money has instead been used to fill the coffers of the government and used in various programs around the country.

The deeper waters of the Gulf of Mexico, hold the promise of large oil and gas reserves. On the US side of the Gulf, almost 300 wells are tapped each year. Last month BP announced a monster find of approx. 3 billion barrels there. Pemex has drilled just ten deepwater wells, but found little oil. It lacks the expertise, technology and capital it needs.

From the Economist:

Even if Mexico allowed private companies to explore for oil, they would have to invest $10 billion a year to halt the decline in output, reckons David Shields, who edits a specialist magazine on Mexican oil. Under today’s law, in which private firms can only act as service providers for Pemex, that investment would be much higher, he says.

The Mexican are in for some hurt in the short term:

Since 2004 (peak year):

  1. Mexican gasoline prices have increased by 20%.
  2. Oil production has dropped by 11%.
  3. Oil rig count has decreased by 20%.
  4. Cantarell’s (largest active field) production has dropped by 30%.
  5. Domestic oil demand has increased by 2.5%.

What does this mean for the United States?

We have to keep in mind that Mexico is the second source of oil imports for the United States  (before Saudi Arabia) with nearly 1.606 mbpd in 2006.

This all means a direct impact on US import sources and the overall price of oil going even higher on the world market place.

Stay tuned to this channel. It’s going to get even more interesting.